October 3, 2008

Giving them what they paid for: A (sort of) follow-up.

In my last post I discussed a particular web design company’s lack of standards compliance and broke down, why I thought that, although they were cheap, they didn’t offer value for money. This time, I’m going to look at the same issue but from the other side. As a designer, you want to give your client the best but at the same time you don’t want to sell yourself short. Of course there are standards that, no matter what the project, you need to stick to… text alternatives to images, always declaring a doctype, these are fundamentals. But published guidelines can get very very picky and sticking to them 100%… well, it can be a bitch. How far is it feasible to take it?

continue reading Giving them what they paid for: A (sort of) follow-up.

September 23, 2008

Getting What you pay for: A (sort of) case study.

So the other day, the local paper came through my door and, being bored, I gave it a quick glance. On the front page, amidst a story of a brave tom cat being involved in some sort of gun based ordeal, I noticed a large full colour advert for a local web design company offering “professional” websites for small-medium businesses for as little as £200! I instantly jumped online and looked at the company’s site, websiteportfolio.co.uk and saw pretty much straight away why the prices were so low.

continue reading Getting What you pay for: A (sort of) case study.

July 12, 2008

Back to the kitchen! I smell somethin’ burnin!

I’ve not blogged in ages, sorry about that. Main reason is I’ve been putting a lot of my time into something pretty special and blog related. That’s right, I’m working on a total re-design. In the past what I’ve done is grabbed a pretty generic looking theme with decent web standards and built on that because I felt that it was a quick and easy way of getting nice looking results… also, I was pretty new to WordPress and didn’t know it all that well. What I’m doing this time, however, is build the whole theme from scratch by building a working XHTML template and then putting in all the bits that WordPress needs after.

continue reading Back to the kitchen! I smell somethin’ burnin!

January 7, 2008

Accessibility - The way forward.

I’ve got the site looking pretty much how I want it now and the next step is going to be taking on the very important task of getting the site’s accessibility in order.

continue reading Accessibility - The way forward.

November 28, 2007

Changes to Footer Section

Over the past couple of days I’ve been playing around adding new content to the footer section of the site. I believe these changes are for the better and give you a better insight into my interests. They also gave some of my HTML and CSS skills a test.

continue reading Changes to Footer Section

November 15, 2007

Gorillas on drums and guinea pigs with credit cards.

I came across a site on WebForumz today that got me thinking about the way things are advertised today and how it differs from the way it was 10 years ago… or how it doesn’t. The site is for a company called Periscopix who deal in pay per click advertising campaigns. The site is totally weird, especially considering the subject matter, with strange flash animations of Rube Goldberg machines powering projectors and elephants riding around on penny farthings. But does this make the site a failure? Well, the jury is out on that one as it hasn’t actually been released yet and it is still hosted on the test server, but early critiques seem to suggest that the site will indeed fail and despite the fact that it is exactly what the client requested of the designer it will, none the less, lose the company business.

continue reading Gorillas on drums and guinea pigs with credit cards.

November 7, 2007

A few improvements.

I’ve been a busy bee, tinkering away with various features and getting around to doing some things that I’ve been putting off because, quite frankly they’re boring to do. I’ll point all the features out so you can at least know what it is that you have no interest in.

Firstly I’ve uploaded my Canada 05 gallery into the galleries section. This was a ball ache to be honest because, although it’s a nice looking method, I still have to enter each link manually which can be very time consuming and repetetive. There are more photos to add to this gallery that I have not yet uploaded to flickr. I’ll be doing this in the next few days. Another thing you might notice in the gallery is that each thumbnail now has a rollover effect similar to the links in the “Rocking my socks” area in the footer. continue reading A few improvements.

October 18, 2007

Galleries are a go!

Following my successful upgrade to WordPress 2.3 the other day I started looking for useful plugins that would allow me to have either a full-blown gallery or an RSS feed from my Flickr/Photobucket/picassa galleries. I found that many of them utilised the new widget functionality but unfortunately my theme does not yet support widgets (I am working on this). I then came across LightBox, a nice plugin that allows links to any photo on the web to be displayed in a nice little javascript box that also allows you to flip forward and back thorugh a photo set that YOU define. So essentially if I had a couple of photos of a car in my photobucket and another couple in my flickr account I could get lightbox to treat them all as one set. Cool huh. continue reading Galleries are a go!

October 17, 2007

Upgrade time!

I decided last week that I would upgrade to the newest version of WordPress - 2.3. and I carried out that upgrade this morning.

It really was a doddle. I backed up the crucial bits and bobs and copied the new files over. Then all I had to do was bring my database into line with the new version and I was done. All in all the upgrade took less than 10 minutes and now my admin side is a lot cleaner with some nice useful features and (hopefully) less spam.:)

I recommend anyone using WP to do this upgrade as it is a piece of piss to do and you can only benefit from the new version.

Hooray! :D

May 11, 2007

Web standards with Spiderman!

As a moderator/staff member at webforumz.com I was asked to write an article on a topic of my choice for the articles section of the site. I decided to talk about the importance of web standards and used the movie Spiderman 3 to illustrate. Below is the article.

When our illustrious leader PM’d me and asked me to write an article for this section and, in his words, “choose any topic you want.” I thought, great, a chance to flex my creative muscles and talk about a topic that my business partner, Adam, and I are coming across more and more. I speak, of course, about web designer fundamentalism and snobbery and how it relates to your client.

The other day I came across a site that broke so many accessibility rules it wasn’t even funny. Images for navigation with no alt tags, serious breaks after a single re-size and no bgcolor set meaning a difference in browser preference could screw the pooch royally. He even used tables for layout in order to get the content to be centred on the X and the Y. Anyway, Adam contacted them and addressed the issues to him, saying that he really should do something about them as he could easily be alienating a large portion of his audience. I don’t remember the exact words he used but he basically stated that he used to care about web standards and accessibility but now just uses tables and this type of coding because he could “make more money” that way. This attitude shocked me at first but then I thought about what he had said.

How many people know what valid XHTML Strict means, let alone care about it enough to pay the extra development costs? I mean really, as long as the site is accessible enough not to exclude a significant amount of your potential audience and not break when someone changes the size of the text, who cares? In case, of course the client specifically asks for it, why bust your hump?

I came to the conclusion that it’s a question of pride in ones work. Sure, they might not ask for it, or even care what it means but will you truly be happy with yourself if you’ve not given them the most thorough and standards-comprehensive site they could have weather they asked for it or not? “Hell no!” I hear some of you cry… and you’re the ones this article is aimed at. The equivalent of comic book fan-boys and pedants. Don’t get me wrong, I like to give my clients good sites with good accessibility and nice clean code but don’t think for one minute that I’m going to stress myself out by spending hours on features that they, and 99% of their visitors aren’t going to even notice, it just seems silly to me.

To put this point another way, I’ll use another topic I know a lot about, movies. I recently watched the long-awaited Spiderman 3 and thoroughly enjoyed every minute of it. Of course I went online and posted about it in one or two forums that I frequent and you could instantly see the ones who were unhappy with the film fell into two categories. Ones who wanted an all out action fest and cared little about the back-story of Spiderman as laid out in the decades of comics, comparable to our friend who wanted to make more money at the cost of his sites’ integrity and ones who bitched and moaned about the fact that Venom calls himself “I” in the film and in the comics he calls himself “we”, the comic book pedants, much like the people who are oh so anal about the application of pedantic web standards that make little or no difference to the client and their visitors. You see, I fall in the middle ground. I really enjoyed the film dispite it’s tiny flaws and enjoyed the back-story, as I have been a fan of comic book Spidey for years.

This is, I feel, the only way to approach web design without either giving yourself stress induced coronary disease, hair loss or a stroke or becoming nothing more than a money hungry heartless villain who pumps out an inferior product at the cost of your integrity. Make sure your clients get a sense of this attitude too because it will pay dividends. This is because they will see that, while still taking care to make sure that their site is functional and accessible, you aren’t looking to pad out your accounts by including hugely irrelevant features and standards. I have recently purchased a domain name on behalf of a customer who we will be starting design for in the next few weeks and already I have sat down with her on many occasions and outlined, in detail what we have been doing, making sure that she knows that were not doing anything she doesn’t want.

Suppose the answer to “How much should I be concerned with all these web standards and WCAG and WAI and stuff?” is:- as much as the individual job calls for. No more, no less.

Rocking my socks

Atmosphere - Strictly leakage Atreyu Sage Francis Rise Against

Recent Reads

Iron Man: Extremis - Warren Ellis and Adi Granov Alan Moore and Dave Gibbons - Watchmen Dean Koontz - Odd Hours